I turn complex systems into clear, scalable experiences. For 12 years I have been the designer organizations rely on when the product is large, the stakes are real, and the work has to hold up.
Most designers can make something look good. Fewer can make it scale. I sit at the intersection of both: a designer who thinks in systems, works fluently with engineers, and has spent 12 years building digital products that perform at enterprise scale across thousands of users, dozens of stakeholders, and product lines that cannot afford to fail.
I have led design for the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States, built systems that brought order to organizations that had none, and shipped work that is still running in production today. What I bring to a team is not just craft. It is clarity, direction, and the discipline to see it through.
Design without strategy is decoration. I get to the root of what a product needs to accomplish, then create the framework that lets every decision after it move faster and land better.
The most expensive design problems are the ones that get discovered late. I work upstream: with stakeholders, product managers, and engineers to align on what we are building and why, before a single pixel is placed.
That means user research, information architecture, experience principles, and the kind of documented design rationale that keeps teams from relitigating the same decisions six months later. My strategic work tends to outlast the projects it starts on, because it gives organizations something they can actually build from.
If your team is moving fast but keeps ending up in the wrong place, this is where we start.
I own the full arc from zero to shipped. Discovery, wireframes, prototypes, high-fidelity UI, and the cross-functional coordination that gets it across the finish line without losing what made it good.
Product design is not a phase. It is a practice that runs through every stage of a product's life. I have done this work in enterprise SaaS environments where a confusing interface costs real money, and in consumer products where first impressions are everything.
What distinguishes my approach is the ability to hold the whole picture: user needs, business constraints, technical reality, and long-term scalability, all at once. I do not hand off a beautiful design and disappear. I stay in it with the team until the product shipped matches the product designed.
The result is work that is not just polished, but coherent, defensible, and built to evolve.
A design system built right is the closest thing to cloning your best designer. I build systems that teams actually use: documented, governed, and structured to scale without falling apart.
Most design systems fail not because they were designed badly, but because they were not designed to be adopted. I build systems with that reality in mind: clear documentation, practical governance, and the buy-in process that gets engineers and designers actually using them.
I have built component libraries and token structures for organizations operating across multiple product lines and sub-brands, where consistency is not just a design preference but an operational requirement. The systems I build are structured enough to prevent drift and flexible enough to not become a bottleneck.
If your organization is scaling and your design is starting to fracture, this is how you fix it before it becomes expensive.
A brand that cannot be applied consistently is not a brand yet. I design identities built for real-world use: sharp enough to make an impression, structured enough to survive a 50-person team.
Brand identity is where design gets seen first and judged fastest. I approach it as a system problem as much as a craft problem: the logo matters, but what matters more is whether the brand holds together when 40 people across 3 departments are applying it independently.
I have led visual identity and brand refresh work for large organizations managing multiple sub-brands under a single parent, where the stakes of inconsistency are measured in trust and revenue. The deliverable is not just a style guide. It is a framework people can actually work from.
The best brand work I have done is work you would not recognize as a redesign. It just looks like the organization finally got clear about who they are.
I speak both languages. Designers who can build reduce friction, catch problems early, and earn trust with engineering teams that most designers never get. That fluency changes how a team works.
There is a particular kind of trust that engineers extend to designers who can open a codebase and find their way around. I have earned that trust repeatedly, and it changes the dynamic of every product team I have been part of.
I write semantic, accessible HTML and CSS. I prototype in the browser when a static mockup is not enough to communicate intent. I flag implementation risks before they reach sprint planning. And when something gets built differently than it was designed, I can have a specific, technical conversation about why it matters and what to do about it.
That is the difference between a designer who hands off and a designer who ships.
Accessibility is not a compliance exercise. It is a signal about how seriously a team takes quality. I build it in from the start, which means it costs a fraction of what it costs to retrofit later.
Organizations that treat accessibility as a legal obligation rather than a design standard tend to end up with products that are technically compliant and practically unusable. I have seen both sides of that, and I know which one leads to better products and fewer remediation bills.
I integrate WCAG 2.1 AA requirements into the design process from day one: in component libraries, in design systems, in review checklists, and in the conversations with developers that happen before code is written. When accessibility is designed in, it stays in.
Accessible products are also better products. Cleaner hierarchy. Clearer language. More resilient layouts. Every team I have introduced this practice to has seen the difference in the work itself, not just the audit results.
Role: Lead UI/UX Designer | Client: Coca-Cola Consolidated | Platform: CONA Enterprise Web Application
The Challenge
Managing retail product authorization across a nationwide bottling network is a coordination problem at a scale most tools are not built for. The original Authorization Tracker gave field teams a way to submit product initiatives and track store-level authorization responses. But as the organization's retail strategy grew more complex, v1 could not keep up. CDMs and field marketers were simultaneously managing Innovation programs, Retail Promotions, and Sustaining Look of Success requirements across thousands of store locations and dozens of managed accounts, with no unified way to track execution, group stores intelligently, or delegate workflow responsibilities across roles.
The 2.0 rebuild was not just a visual refresh. It was a functional expansion of the platform's core capabilities, and it needed to work for people who move fast, operate across multiple retail relationships at once, and have very little patience for tools that slow them down.
The Approach
I led UX and UI design for Authorization Tracker 2.0, working within the CONA platform ecosystem where every design decision has to account for a wide range of users, roles, and operational contexts. The 2.0 architecture introduced three distinct workflow tracks: Innovation, Retail Promotions, and Sustaining LOS, each with its own data model and authorization logic, all accessible through a single unified interface.
A central design challenge was the Customer Collection system: a way for teams to define, save, and reuse custom store groupings across multiple initiatives and promotions. This required careful information architecture work to make the creation, editing, and association flows intuitive without adding friction to the daily authorization workflow. The new Local Data Management tools gave bottler administrators direct control over execution detail categories, zone definitions, and super channel configurations. User management was rebuilt with a delegated permissions model, allowing administrators to manage CDM and marketing role access at a granular level. The monthly tracker view was expanded to give teams a full fiscal-year picture of authorization status, store participation counts, and execution percentages in a single scannable interface.
The Outcome
Authorization Tracker 2.0 gave Coca-Cola Consolidated's field and marketing teams a platform that could finally match the complexity of their work. By consolidating Innovation, Retail Promotions, and Sustaining LOS into a single role-aware application, the tool eliminated the operational fragmentation that had forced teams across multiple systems. The result was a more scalable, more governable authorization workflow, built to support a distribution network operating at a scale very few organizations ever reach.
Role: UX Designer | Client: Coca-Cola Consolidated | Platform: Enterprise iPad Application | Scope: Approval Workflow & Legal/Contract Execution
The Challenge
Club Coke is a fully deployed enterprise iPad application used by Coca-Cola Consolidated field representatives to manage the entire commercial planning and contract lifecycle for retail accounts across the bottling network. The platform covers account discovery, commercial plan building, Look of Success presentations, pricing, funding, and legal execution in a single end-to-end workflow. I was brought in to design two of the most governance-critical sections of the application: the multi-tier approval workflow and the legal contract execution suite.
These were not typical UX problems. The approval workflow sits at the intersection of business rules, financial guardrails, and organizational hierarchy. A field rep's commercial plan for any given account must pass through a tiered chain of approvers, from ASMs to Directors to Senior Directors to Vice Presidents, with specific guardrails automatically determining which level of approval is required based on the plan's financial parameters. Contract Break Even %, Lifetime Funding per Case, Pricing Level Versus Categories, and Volume per Asset are just a few of the guardrail conditions that route plans to the right approver. Getting any of this wrong in the field means a contract that cannot be executed, a deal that stalls, or a compliance failure that has real financial consequences.
The Approach
For the approval workflow, the core design challenge was making a highly complex, rule-driven routing system legible to field reps who needed to understand where their plan stood, why it was routed the way it was, and what needed to change to move it forward. I designed the Required Approver Levels modal, which surfaces the full guardrail matrix in a scannable table format showing each guardrail condition, its required final approver, and the resulting approval level. Color-coded rows flag which specific guardrails are triggering elevated approval requirements, giving reps immediate, actionable clarity without requiring them to understand the underlying business logic from scratch.
The SNAPSHOT panel, persistent throughout the plan-building workflow, was designed to give reps a live, at-a-glance view of how their current plan compares to the existing account state across every key metric: volume, funding, assets, gross profit, operating profit, and lifetime value. This persistent context panel was critical to the approval workflow because it let reps understand in real time whether a plan change would trigger a guardrail, before they submitted for approval.
For the legal and contract execution suite, I designed the full Terms and Conditions presentation, the dual-signature capture interface for both the customer and the CCBCC employee, the ACH and W9 forms section, and the EMO (Equipment Management Order) linking workflow. The signature screens had to work reliably on an iPad in a retail environment, display the full contract terms legibly, and capture legally valid signatures from both parties in a flow that a field rep could complete at the customer's location without technical support. The Contract Details modal, which captures start date, term length, and auto-calculates the end date, was designed to be fast and error-resistant, since a misconfigured contract term has downstream legal and financial implications that cannot easily be corrected after the fact.
The Outcome
Club Coke shipped and was fully deployed to Coca-Cola Consolidated field representatives across the bottling network. The approval workflow and legal execution features I designed handle real commercial contracts, real funding commitments, and real multi-party signatures on active retail accounts. Designing for this environment required a level of precision and consequence-awareness that goes well beyond typical product design work. Every interface decision had to account for the fact that field reps are using this tool in a retail environment, often under time pressure, with a customer in front of them and a contract on the line.
Role: Founder & Chair | Org: Coca-Cola Consolidated | Deliverable: Enterprise Design Governance Program
The Challenge
Coca-Cola Consolidated operates one of the most complex digital ecosystems in the beverage industry, with digital properties, internal platforms, and branded experiences spanning IT, Marketing, eCommerce, Corporate Communications, HR, Equipment Services, Red Classic, CONA, Data Ventures, and Corporate Services. Each function was making independent design decisions. There was no shared standard, no cross-functional visibility, and no governing body to ensure that what shipped across those touchpoints was consistent, on-brand, or strategically aligned. The cumulative effect was brand drift at enterprise scale: not dramatic, but persistent, and expensive to unwind.
The Approach
I identified the gap and built the solution without being asked to. I founded and chaired the Coca-Cola Consolidated Design Council, a cross-functional governance body with representation from every major business unit in the organization. I authored the Design Council Charter, a formal governing document that established the council's scope, objectives, methodology, compliance strategy, and KPI framework. The charter was written for an audience of executive leadership, IT leadership, business leaders, the PMO, and enterprise architects, and structured to live as a versioned, annually reviewed organizational document.
The council's four core objectives were Responsive and Adaptive Design, Design Assessment and Standardization, Strategic Business Alignment, and Design Consolidation. Each had defined expected outcomes tied to measurable KPIs: scale of design influence across the organization, growth in design-related investment, depth of embedded design process, executive-level design representation, and integration of design into innovation culture. The compliance strategy introduced Brand Impact Assessments and Brand Compliance Reviews as standing functions of the council, with metrics designed to quantify progress over time rather than rely on subjective judgment.
The Outcome
The Design Council gave Coca-Cola Consolidated a formal governance structure for design that had never existed before. For the first time, stakeholders across more than ten business units had a shared forum, a documented standard, and a defined process for making design decisions at the organizational level rather than the individual one. The charter established the institutional foundation: a versioned, board-approved governing document built to scale with the organization and outlast any single contributor. I built it from nothing, got cross-functional alignment, and put it into motion.
Role: Lead UI/UX Designer | Timeline: 3–6 Months | Stakeholders: Corporate Communications Team | Live Site: cokeconsolidated.com
The Challenge
Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States, serving millions of customers across 14 states. Despite that scale, the company's corporate website had fallen behind, becoming visually dated, inconsistent in tone, and no longer reflective of the brand's stature or ambitions.
The site wasn't broken. But it wasn't working hard enough either. For a company of this size, the corporate website is a critical touchpoint: it speaks to investors, potential employees, community partners, and the press, often before any human contact is made. The existing design wasn't telling that story well. The goal was clear: redesign the site from the ground up to reflect where Coca-Cola Consolidated was heading, not just where it had been.
The Approach
I led the end-to-end redesign in close collaboration with the Corporate Communications team, beginning with a full audit of the existing site's content architecture, visual identity, and audience needs. The site serves multiple distinct audiences, including investors, prospective employees, community partners, and the press, and the previous structure wasn't effectively guiding any of them.
The information architecture was rebuilt from scratch to give each audience a clear, efficient path to what they needed. Visually, the redesign drew directly from Coca-Cola Consolidated's brand standards while pushing the execution forward by introducing stronger typographic hierarchy, a more disciplined use of color and photography, and a layout system designed to scale across the organization's growing content needs.
Accessibility and responsive performance were non-negotiable requirements throughout. Every design decision was made with the understanding that this site would be seen by a wide range of users, across a wide range of devices, often as their very first interaction with the brand.
The Outcome
The result is a modern, strategically grounded digital presence that performs across audiences, devices, and teams. The redesign gave Coca-Cola Consolidated a corporate website that finally matched the scale and ambition of the company behind it: a site that communicates with authority, builds trust on first impression, and serves as a durable foundation for future growth.
Role: Lead UI/UX Designer | Client: Coca-Cola Consolidated | Deliverable: Internal Brand Governance Document
The Challenge
Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States, operating digital properties at significant scale. But despite that scale, no formal brand guide existed to govern how those digital experiences were designed and built. Teams across communications, IT, marketing, and engineering were making independent visual decisions, resulting in inconsistent color application, typography drift, and brand treatments that varied across properties in ways that quietly undermined the organization's credibility and cohesion.
The Coca-Cola Company maintains comprehensive brand standards at the parent level, but those standards were not being formally translated into actionable guidance for the internal teams building and maintaining digital products at the bottler level. The gap between what the brand should look like and what was actually being shipped had been growing for years, and no one had taken ownership of closing it.
The Approach
I identified the problem and drove the solution without being asked to. Starting with UX research into The Coca-Cola Company's official brand standards, I studied the color system, typography choices, logo usage rules, photography principles, accessibility requirements, and brand voice guidelines at the parent brand level. From that research, I synthesized a Coca-Cola Consolidated-specific brand guide that translated enterprise-level standards into practical, actionable documentation for the teams doing the daily work.
The guide established the complete color palette with specific hex and RGB values for every approved color, defined TCCC Unity as the required primary typeface, documented logo usage rules including approved colorways and spatial requirements, and codified the brand voice across three dimensions: Authentic, Expert, and Trusted. A clear set of Do's and Don'ts was developed to make the guidance portable and easy to apply consistently, regardless of who was building the experience or which property they were working on.
The Outcome
The brand guide gave Coca-Cola Consolidated something they did not have before: a shared standard that internal teams, vendors, and agency partners could all work from. Design decisions that had previously been made by instinct or individual preference could now be made by reference to a documented, approved standard. The guide reduced inconsistency across digital touchpoints, gave new team members a clear onboarding resource, and established the governance foundation that the organization's growing digital portfolio needed to maintain a strong, cohesive brand presence.
Role: Lead UI/UX Designer | Client: Red Classic (Coca-Cola Consolidated Subsidiary) | Live Site: redclassic.com
The Challenge
Red Classic is one of the few large carriers in the country that combines comprehensive transportation services with full fleet maintenance capabilities, which is a genuine differentiator in a crowded industry. But their digital presence wasn't telling that story. As a subsidiary of Coca-Cola Consolidated, they needed a website that could stand on its own: one that spoke clearly to shippers, fleet partners, and potential employees, and communicated their "Dedicated to Serve. Built to Execute." brand identity with authority and clarity.
The Approach
I led the design and development of the Red Classic website from the ground up, working in close partnership with their marketing and communications stakeholders. The goal was a site that felt operationally confident, bold without being loud, and organized around the service lines users care most about: dedicated transportation solutions, managed transportation, freight, and managed fleet maintenance.
The information architecture was restructured to serve two distinct audiences: shippers evaluating a logistics partner and drivers or technicians exploring career opportunities, so each could find what they needed quickly. The visual design drew from Red Classic's brand identity, using strong typographic hierarchy, high-impact imagery, and a clean layout that positioned them as an experienced and trustworthy partner in a demanding industry.
The Outcome
The result is a responsive, brand-aligned digital presence that clearly communicates Red Classic's full range of services and competitive advantages across all devices. The site unifies their dual expertise in transportation and fleet maintenance under a cohesive visual identity, reinforcing their position as a complete transportation partner, not just a carrier.
Role: Lead UI/UX Designer | Client: Equipment Reutilization Solutions (Coca-Cola Consolidated Subsidiary) | Live Site: erscompany.com
The Challenge
Equipment Reutilization Solutions (ERS) is a Monroe, NC-based service company and Coca-Cola Consolidated subsidiary specializing in the repair, installation, maintenance, and restoration of commercial beverage equipment, including coolers, vending machines, fountains, and more, for businesses across the United States. With certified technicians having serviced over 180,000 pieces of equipment, ERS had a serious operation behind them. What they needed was a website that matched it.
Their existing digital presence wasn't effectively communicating the full breadth of their services, from standard repair and preventative maintenance to their 9-Step Certified Refurbishment process and vintage restoration work. The site needed to clearly serve both prospective business clients looking for a reliable service partner and existing customers who needed to quickly understand what ERS could do for them.
The Approach
I led the design and development of the ERS website with a focus on clarity and service discoverability. ERS offers a wide range of distinct service lines, including Repair, Installation & Delivery, Preventative Maintenance, Training, Vintage Restoration, Refurbished Equipment, and Water Filtration, and a major goal of the redesign was making sure each of those offerings had its own clear, findable presence on the site rather than being buried in generic copy.
The visual design was built to reflect ERS's professional credibility and approachability as a company that works hands-on with businesses every day and prides itself on responsive, expert service. Typography, iconography, and layout were chosen to communicate competence and reliability at a glance, while keeping the experience clean and easy to navigate for a broad range of users.
The Outcome
The result is a professional, service-forward digital presence that gives ERS the credibility their operation deserves. Each service line is clearly presented and accessible, helping prospective clients quickly understand the full scope of what ERS offers, and giving existing customers a reliable resource for scheduling and support. The site positions ERS as exactly what they are: a trusted, nationwide partner for commercial beverage equipment needs.